Home > Getting Traffic > Are Sales Letter Traffic Stats Misleading?

Are Sales Letter Traffic Stats Misleading?

af Mikael · 9 Kommentarer

Have you ever wondered why sales letters selling traffic increasing products (both software and ebooks) are always able to show you screen prints from their own sites with huge amounts of traffic? Well one of the reasons lie in the type of software they’re using to monitor the traffic.

To make this a bit clearer I’ve taken my website www.petinsurancepro.com and taken the stats from September 2008 and visualized it using Awstats, Webalizer and Google Analytics.

Now I have to be honest with you and tell you that I have no clue which of these programs that shows the correct numbers but I do know that the stats from Google Analytics tend to match the stats from Google Adsense (obviously!!). Not that the Adsense counter is necessarily right, but I tend to think that it is more accurate. But you can judge. Here are the stats (click on the image to see full size):

Google Analytics

Awstats

Webalizer

So if you were selling a product that was to increase traffic, what program would you use to show stats?

  • Google showing 1,986 visits (5,018 pageviews)
  • Awstats showing 4,849 visits (17,549 pageviews)
  • Webalizer showing 7,284 visits (94,852 pageviews)
  • Again let me tell you that I don’t know what is right and what is wrong but I do know that it is obvious why most sales letters show Awstats and Webalizer numbers instead of the numbers from Analytics.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Tags:

    Nu kan du få de nye indlæg leveret gratis via RSS eller e-mail:

    Artikel af Mikael

    gravatar

    Mikael er ejeren af AntPhilosophy.com. Han har en interesse og en passion for internet markedsføring online og et altovervejende mål om at skabe en stor passiv indkomst på nettet. En indkomst der kan skabe økonomisk uafhængighed. Han deler ud af sin erfaring og viden så andre kan opnå det samme... hvis de vil. Vejen går ofte forbi søgemaskineoptimering, automatisering, outsourcing, affiliate marketing, Google Adsense og meget mere. Tilmeld dig hans RSS feed her.

    Kommentarer (9)

    1. I think that waht Google Analytics calls “Visits” is what AWstats calls “Unique visitors”…
      Google Analytics can filter your own visits when you are logged in I guess – to my knbowledge AWstats don’t do this.

      Not that you point is wrong – it still a BIG difference (but not quite as big as 4,849 vs. 1,986). :-)

    2. Christian, like you I don’t know much about Awstats, but Analytics has “”Absolute Unique Visitors” which one could assume were the same as Awstats “uniques”.

      But yes it is a huge difference and especially compared to Webalizer.

    3. Here’s an old report from 2007, comparing some of the enterprise web analytics solutions to each other, and explaining what’s what:
      http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/analytics-report-august-2007.shtml

      Although a lot has happened in the world of analytics since then, it’s still worth a read if you are into that kind of stuff.

      I haven’t worked with AWstats or Webalizer in years, but aren’t they based on log files analysis?

      Because then they have a huge flaw that could explain the difference in numbers: They are not able to discount bots, whereas GA is.

    4. Thanks Søren, I’ll give it a read. I do believe though that at least Awstats should only show visits from humans and not bots.

    5. From Awstats’ website it states that both Awstats and Webalizer shows “human” visits, but that only Awstats shows “unique visits”. Here is the page: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/docs/awstats_compare.html

    6. Ah, I see.

      The only thing I can add is that once not long ago I did a comparison of Google Analytics vs. IndexTools. And they both came pretty close to reporting the same figures, especially when looking at something as “universal” as a PageView.

      In my eyes there’s something wrong with the way you’ve implemented your tracking. Otherwise the figures wouldn’t be that far off.

      But which of the 3 tools it is that is not properly implemented is pretty impossible for me to tell, I’m afraid.

    7. Søren, as we discussed in our emails I think we can agree that GA is probably the most accurate of these three tools. One thing that could argue that GA’s numbers are too low is that the automatic translation tool that I have on the site doesn’t copy GA’s code and will therefore not count in the statistics.

      I don’t know if it came through okay but my whole point was to show everyone that the stats you often see in sales letters are probably far too high and thereby somewhat misleading.

    8. I use Cystats on my WordPress site. The numbers are always lower – sometimes over 1/2 as many as AWStats and Google say. I’ve been wondering which is correct myself.

      I worked with AWStats way back when. A friend of mine was hosting my site on a home-brewed server. There is a setting to block you from being counted by setting an IP address. That said, when I moved to a regular host that had AWStats, I’ve never been able to get that working, and since then, I’ve forgotten exactly what you do. I believe you have to have access to the AWStats dir on your host.

      Anyhow, interesting article.

    9. Hi Shawn, thank you for your comment. Even though I might not be blocked from the Awstats, I’m pretty sure that my visits alone is not what makes up the difference :)

    Skriv en Kommentar

    *

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

    Mikael's Favoritter

    Succes i en tidlig alder – På vej mod 100K/år i Adsense

    Med mere end 700 downloads (i skrivende stund 745) af min e-bog Den Komplette Guide Til Passiv Indkomst På Nettet har det været meget tydeligt for mig, at der er et kæmpe behov og ønske fra mange danskere om at lære hvordan man kan tjene nogle penge via internettet. Umiddelbart efter e-bogen blev tilgængelig, frigav [...]

    Lever af nettet – Adsense er kun en lille del af det

    Denne gang har jeg den store fornøjelse af præsentere en kendt mad-blogger som Adsense succes historie. Han er egentlig en meget større succes end hans Adsense indkomst viser, men da emnet for denne serie udelukkende fokuserer på Adsense, så er det den del du kommer til at høre om. Det spændende ved dette interview er, [...]

    Studerende har “dobbelt SU” pga. passiv indkomst

    Så er tiden kommet til endnu et spændende indlæg med en gut der har succes med at skabe sig en passiv indkomst. Peter Holst er studerende og har lige nu det luksusproblem, at hans passive indtægt kan gøre, at han skal til at betale SU tilbage. Hans sider er næsten 100 % passive lige nu, [...]

    42.000 kr. årligt som bi-indtægt og kun 24 år gammel

    Så er det blevet tid til endnu et interview med en person der har stor succes med at tjene penge på sine hjemmesider. Casper arbejder både med Adsense og Affiliate, samt laver SEO arbejde ved siden af. Han er gået selvstændig her i 2011 og lyder til at nyde det. Har du spørgsmål til Casper, [...]

    19 år – knap 3k pr. måned med meget få timers arbejde

    Næste person jeg har stillet spørgsmål omkring hans passive indtægt er kun 19 år. Han outsourcer allerede en pæn del af arbejdet til andre og er godt på vej til en rigtig interessant passiv indkomst. Jeg har stillet ham de samme 17 spørgsmål som jeg stillede Morten. Hans tilgang er lidt anderledes, men er endnu [...]

    Tjente hurtigt 4 cifre – kun 2-3 måneder

    I forbindelse med den meget snarlige lancering af min e-bog (venter kun på designeren skal blive færdig), så vil jeg over de kommende dage publicere en række indlæg i form af succeshistorier fra folk der har bevist, at det kan lade sig gøre at tjene penge på internettet og i særdeleshed ved hjælp af Googles [...]

    Om Mikael

    Mit navn er Mikael Rieck Kousgaard og jeg er bloggeren bag AntPhilosophy. Min passion er online markedsføring og metoder til at tjene penge på nettet. Jeg lærer konstant nye ting og deler ud af dem her på bloggen. Hvis du vil vide mere om mig, så klik på knappen herunder.

    Om mig