<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Want Your RSS Readers To Dictate Your Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/</link>
	<description>Lær hvordan du får succes med internet markedsføring online. Alt fra værktøjer til skridt for skridt forklaringer der vil sikre dig succes online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Af: Freebies</title>
		<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>Freebies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antphilosophy.com/?p=688#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>The whole part about why people ask you why you have adsense if you don&#039;t want to make money always pisses me off too. Its not like having a website is free, its not like it doesn&#039;t also take up time and energy. As long as you are doing it ethically there is nothing wrong with getting compensated for your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole part about why people ask you why you have adsense if you don&#8217;t want to make money always pisses me off too. Its not like having a website is free, its not like it doesn&#8217;t also take up time and energy. As long as you are doing it ethically there is nothing wrong with getting compensated for your hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antphilosophy.com/?p=688#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very interesting theme you have brought up here Michael (and Syed). And it could very easy be the same discussion in a lot of other areas of business. An amateur sing a song writer creates songs to express him self, not to make money. The same with most bloggers.

The Pro does it for money, and therefore it&#039;s really the customers taste and frequency that decides his level of income. Therefore he have to do it much more for his audience, and much less for him self. And in order to do this he must listen to and follow his audience very carefully.

No one is more right than the other, but I think that the Pro makes much more money.

Yours
Pete :-)

PS: I do it mostly for money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very interesting theme you have brought up here Michael (and Syed). And it could very easy be the same discussion in a lot of other areas of business. An amateur sing a song writer creates songs to express him self, not to make money. The same with most bloggers.</p>
<p>The Pro does it for money, and therefore it&#8217;s really the customers taste and frequency that decides his level of income. Therefore he have to do it much more for his audience, and much less for him self. And in order to do this he must listen to and follow his audience very carefully.</p>
<p>No one is more right than the other, but I think that the Pro makes much more money.</p>
<p>Yours<br />
Pete <img src='http://www.antphilosophy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS: I do it mostly for money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Mikael</title>
		<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antphilosophy.com/?p=688#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>Syed, thank you for taking the time to respond to this post. I know that you didn&#039;t advice people to change their blog ENTIRELY but you did write the following:

&lt;center&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Find out why your readers subscribe to your blog? So you can write what they want and get more subscribers.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

I can&#039;t argue with you about whether or not I have misinterpreted your post because I can only read what you write and the statement above tells blog owners to write to specifically gain more readers and thereby I conclude that &quot;gaining more readers&quot; becomes more important than keeping the uniqueness of the blog.

If changing your writing from what YOU want to write about to what YOUR READERS wants to read isn&#039;t equal to &quot;letting subscribers dictate your content&quot; then please try to explain to my why that is.

But to be fair I might not state that you ADVICE people to change what they write but merely that you are encouraging them to do so to attract more subscribers. Is that fair to say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syed, thank you for taking the time to respond to this post. I know that you didn&#8217;t advice people to change their blog ENTIRELY but you did write the following:</p>
<p><center><strong>Find out why your readers subscribe to your blog? So you can write what they want and get more subscribers.</strong></center></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t argue with you about whether or not I have misinterpreted your post because I can only read what you write and the statement above tells blog owners to write to specifically gain more readers and thereby I conclude that &#8220;gaining more readers&#8221; becomes more important than keeping the uniqueness of the blog.</p>
<p>If changing your writing from what YOU want to write about to what YOUR READERS wants to read isn&#8217;t equal to &#8220;letting subscribers dictate your content&#8221; then please try to explain to my why that is.</p>
<p>But to be fair I might not state that you ADVICE people to change what they write but merely that you are encouraging them to do so to attract more subscribers. Is that fair to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Syed Balkhi</title>
		<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Balkhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antphilosophy.com/?p=688#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Hey Mikael, 

First I would like to say thank you for the mention of Balkhis and putting your thoughts on the table. 

I didn&#039;t advice people to change their blog entirely. I only asked questions that were asked to me by many bloggers. Blogs are usually started for a reason. Like I started mine to share my experience and tips. No, I will not change it to what my readers want. I will change it the way I like it. 

You just have to be yourself and I agree with you on that one. I think you might have misinterpreted my post. My point was not telling users to change your blog so you gain more subscribers. It was why your RSS readers subscribe and what you can do to improve. Having freebies and Giveaways is entirely upto the blogger. Wanting or not wanting RSS Subscribers is also entirely upto the blogger. It is their personal choice which they have to make. Just be yourself.

No they should not change their blog because their users want them to. 


I just thought I should add that in because it is a different thing to have an opinion but an opinion that was led by a misinterpretation is another thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mikael, </p>
<p>First I would like to say thank you for the mention of Balkhis and putting your thoughts on the table. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t advice people to change their blog entirely. I only asked questions that were asked to me by many bloggers. Blogs are usually started for a reason. Like I started mine to share my experience and tips. No, I will not change it to what my readers want. I will change it the way I like it. </p>
<p>You just have to be yourself and I agree with you on that one. I think you might have misinterpreted my post. My point was not telling users to change your blog so you gain more subscribers. It was why your RSS readers subscribe and what you can do to improve. Having freebies and Giveaways is entirely upto the blogger. Wanting or not wanting RSS Subscribers is also entirely upto the blogger. It is their personal choice which they have to make. Just be yourself.</p>
<p>No they should not change their blog because their users want them to. </p>
<p>I just thought I should add that in because it is a different thing to have an opinion but an opinion that was led by a misinterpretation is another thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Kim Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.antphilosophy.com/want-your-rss-readers-to-dictate-your-content/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antphilosophy.com/?p=688#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>I totaly agree with you Mikael.

If I had a blog whose only purpose was to earn money, I would do everything to get more subscribers and more visitors. But I&#039;m not.

My blog, is where I write what I think is exciting. It would be stupid to change the whole blog, or big parts of it, just to get some new subscribers. 
Because if you totaly change what you are writing about, then some of the &#039;old&#039; subscribers and loyal readers would flee because it didn&#039;t interest them anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totaly agree with you Mikael.</p>
<p>If I had a blog whose only purpose was to earn money, I would do everything to get more subscribers and more visitors. But I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>My blog, is where I write what I think is exciting. It would be stupid to change the whole blog, or big parts of it, just to get some new subscribers.<br />
Because if you totaly change what you are writing about, then some of the &#8216;old&#8217; subscribers and loyal readers would flee because it didn&#8217;t interest them anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

